Mac disk doctor app. Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test - how do I download the app on PC? If you want to download the software on your pc or mac, you could either first visit the Mac store or Windows AppStore and search for the app OR you can easily use any of the download links we provided above under the 'Download and Install' header section to download the application. Blackmagic Disk Speed Test. Free to download from the App Store, the Blackmagic Disk Speed Test. Starting the test with a simple click is easy. Disk Speed Test will write test data your disk using large blocks of data and then display the result. Disk Speed Test will continue to test writes and reads from your disk so you can evaluate both performance and readability over time. Related: 5 Built-in Mac Security Software you Never Knew in OS.
UserBenchmark of the month
How it works
- - Download and run UserBenchMark.
- - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- - See speed test results from other users.
- - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
- - Share your opinion by voting.
Screenshots
35,280,632 PCs tested. | PC Score | PC Status |
---|---|---|
6 secs agoAsus PRIME Z390-P | Tree trunk | 85% |
10 secs agoAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING | Nuclear submarine | 47% |
11 secs agoDell Precision 5540 | Battleship | 42% |
13 secs agoDell Vostro 7590 | Battleship | 70% |
17 secs agoSpectre x360 Convertible 13-. | Yacht | 20% |
17 secs agoLenovo 20NJCTO1WW | Tree trunk | 82% |
18 secs agoGA-B450M DS3H WIFI-CF | Aircraft carrier | 75% |
19 secs agoGigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF | Aircraft carrier | 74% |
22 secs agoAcer Nitro AN515-44 | Battleship | 49% |
24 secs agoGigabyte GA-H97M-Gaming 3 | Aircraft carrier | 59% |
28 secs agoHP ProDesk 600 G3 MT | Gunboat | 69% |
29 secs agoMPG B550 GAMING EDGE WIFI (M. | Nuclear submarine | 56% |
31 secs agoDell Latitude E7450 | Sail boat | 35% |
31 secs agoAsus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING | Aircraft carrier | 36% |
35 secs agoAsus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS | UFO | 67% |
36 secs agoMAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7. | UFO | 53% |
36 secs agoAcer Aspire A515-51G | Battleship | 84% |
36 secs agoHP CQ1-4117LA | Surfboard | 39% |
38 secs agoAsrock X570 Taichi | Nuclear submarine | 75% |
38 secs agoLenovo 10T8S35X00 | Gunboat | 44% |
39 secs agoAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS | Nuclear submarine | 51% |
41 secs agoDell Precision 5750 | Nuclear submarine | 64% |
41 secs agoMPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (M. | UFO | 81% |
45 secs agoAsus Z170-PRO | Aircraft carrier | 67% |
47 secs agoHP 510-a010 | Jet ski | 45% |
47 secs agoGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X | Nuclear submarine | 68% |
49 secs agoPrecision WorkStation T3500 . | Yacht | 73% |
49 secs agoAsus PRIME Z390-P | Nuclear submarine | 71% |
50 secs agoHP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | Destroyer | 76% |
53 secs agoGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X | Nuclear submarine | 76% |
53 secs agoAsrock Z270 Gaming K6 | Nuclear submarine | 51% |
54 secs agoX470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B7. | Nuclear submarine | 72% |
56 secs agoMicrosoft Surface Book 2 | Battleship | 79% |
56 secs agoAcer Aspire A515-41G | Jet ski | 26% |
57 secs agoAsus G751JY | Battleship | 87% |
57 secs agoLenovo 81YH | Aircraft carrier | 81% |
59 secs agoAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS | Tree trunk | 57% |
1 min agoDell G3 3579 | Yacht | 26% |
1 min agoMPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C3. | Aircraft carrier | 56% |
1 min agoMSI B450 Tomahawk | Tree trunk | 50% |
1 min agoGIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra | UFO | 81% |
1 min agoAsus PRIME Z390-A | Nuclear submarine | 20% |
1 min agoMSI MS-1795 | Yacht | 30% |
1 min agoB250 KRAIT GAMING (MS-7A68) | Nuclear submarine | 73% |
1 min agoMSI Z77A-G43 (MS-7758) | Yacht | 38% |
1 min agoLenovo K3011W | Tree trunk | 72% |
1 min agoROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-. | Nuclear submarine | 55% |
1 min agoTUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) | Aircraft carrier | 52% |
1 min agoHP EliteBook 840 G5 | Tree trunk | 53% |
1 min agoKoloe X58 | Battleship | 45% |
As reported by MacRumors, eager Apple developers are already posting benchmarks on the developer transition kits for Macs with Apple silicon. These kits are based on the Mac mini chassis but include ARM-derived Apple silicon rather than Intel CPUs.
https://nitibalpos.tistory.com/21. Uninstall sunflower mac. Before we dig in, it's important to note a few caveats. First, the CPU included in these developer kits may or may not reflect the CPUs included in future Apple Macs. These are not consumer products; they're developer tools. https://goodspiritual.weebly.com/any-pdf-to-dwg-converter-registration-code-free-download.html. Second, the benchmarks were done using Rosetta, which likely still has many changes and optimizations coming. And thirdly, the developers who've leaked this information are in violation of non-disclosure agreements at Apple.
Developers who wanted access to the kit were required to pay a $500 access fee, agree to return the kit after one year—and agree not to publicly write about, review, share, or display the unit without Apple's prior written approval. At least eight developers so far seem not to have read the fine print, judging by the uploads to Geekbench's online leaderboard.
Apple Benchmark Test
There is currently no way of knowing whether these leaks are deliberate or accidental. At Ars, we frequently get to benchmark hardware that isn't available to the general public and whose details are under embargo as well—and we can confirm that you need to pay close attention to what you're doing. Most modern benchmark utilities have an online leaderboard, with an 'upload results' button baked right into the utility—and in some cases, they even upload by default unless you specifically force them not to.Accidental or not, the leaks give us some additional information about the potential performance of the new Macs with Apple silicon, though nothing conclusive. The developer transition kits are equipped with what seems to be a variant of the A12Z SoC found in the latest iPad Pro models. These Geekbench database entries also report the virtual CPU as four-core, rather than eight—even though the A12Z as we know it in the iPad Pro is an octa-core CPU.
Four of the A12Z's cores are high-power fast cores, and the other four are low-power slow cores used to increase battery efficiency when running background tasks. This configuration is common in the ARM world but nearly unheard of in x86. So it's not too surprising that an x86 emulation would ignore the big/little configuration and report itself as a simpler four-core setup regardless of underlying reality.
These tests appear to have been run in Geekbench 5.2.0 for macOS x86 (64-bit)—meaning they were run in Rosetta, Apple's tool for emulating x86 Macs on ARM-based Apple silicon.Mac Os Benchmark
As for the results, the Apple silicon-equipped developer kits average 811 for single-threaded Geekbench and 2781 for multi-threaded. That's about 20 percent slower than the entry-level i3-1000ng4 powered Macbook Air's single-core results and 38 percent faster than its multi-threaded results. Higher-end Macs produce much higher numbers, though.
What's impressive about these leaked numbers is that they're not for Geekbench running natively in ARM mode. https://dutchclever183.weebly.com/download-game-psp-virtua-tennis-4.html. These tell us what emulation of legacy apps might look like on Apple silicon Macs—and it's likely early adopters of Apple's new ARM-based Macs will use Rosetta to run at least some apps, so it's a potentially useful insight.
Mac Benchmark Testing
Rosetta 2's performance characteristics aren't well-known enough yet to meaningfully extrapolate the A12Z's native performance—but if the leaked numbers are correct, we can assume it will be quite good.How To Benchmark Mac
All that said, there is no indication yet that the A12Z will actually ship in consumer Macs. Phantasy star portable 2 download. Apple may have plans to introduce a very different chip when it actually comes to market with the new Macs, so while these benchmarks are an intriguing curiosity, they are not certain to be representative of what we'll see when the real deal arrives later this year. These kits weren't designed to reflect the final hardware of Apple silicon Macs.